Saturday, May 19, 2012

WKU Controversy: Art or Attack?

Posted by GCA students "J.P.G.", "H.M.C.", "A.K.B", "K.M.I.", "J.T.R.", and "O.R.P."

 
        Once again we have another attack on Christianity under the excuse that it is “art”. Elaina Smith, an art student at Western Kentucky University, was caught placing condoms on crosses that were set up on campus to represent the number of abortions that happened in a day. Smith s assignment was to create an art exhibit.

       Is placing condoms on some other student's project count as an exhibit? Some art students think that it is art because it is expresses opinions and draws emotion; on the other hand, art students do not think it takes much artistic talent to do what Smith did. Where should the line be drawn between freedom of expression and infringing on another's expression. The art teacher at WKU did not discourage what Smith did, but rather encouraged her. The President, Gary Ransdell, claimed that Elaina apologized, but Elaina claimed otherwise to the media.*

       What constitutes placing condoms on someone else's exhibit as one's own exhibit? Should Smith receive a grade for her own freedom of expression impending on someone else's project or should she create her own project. One must ask themselves; had condoms been placed on a Buddhist or Muslim symbol would the outcry for justice been louder. This was not an art project but an attack against Christianity.

*BOWLING GREEN, KENTUCKY, April 25, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) – The student who placed condoms over 3,700 crosses at Western Kentucky University as part of an “art project,” has told the media she has not apologized for the desecration, as university president Gary Ransdell publicly claimed she had done. The girl’s art professor has also admitted she approved the vandalism.

Obama's Announcement

Posted by GCA student "R.T.W."

            Ever since North Carolina decided to ban homosexual marriages, the issues of same sex marriage has been floating about in politics. With the Presidential elections just around the corner, Democrats and Republicans are taking sides on this issue. As Barack Obama seeks reelection, he needed to officially declare which side of the fence he is on, and he made the announcement last week. Obama told ABC news that he believes same sex couples should be allowed to marry.
            This announcement will have impact on events coming up in the nearby future. The obvious one is the Presidential election. Obama clearly hopes that his announcement will get him the votes. Republicans also plan to address the issue in their campaign. The issue on same sex marriage is sure to lose some votes for both parties, or perhaps boost one candidate to victory. Either way, it will be an important factor when voters fill out their ballots.
            Since this all stemmed from the North Carolina ban, it is important to look at the state level regarding this issue. Thirty-nine states already had a ban on same sex marriages, but because of today's culture and the upcoming election, North Carolina gets all the attention. It's not like this is something completely new and unheard of. Thanks to the Defense of Marriage Act, many states have adopted this policy. If it were not for the Presidential election, this would  not be such a big issue, and Obama would never had said anything.

Is President Obama an Avenger?

Posted by GCA student "C.S."

                President Obama has officially declared that his position of homosexual rights has “evolved” to the point that he now believes homosexual couples should have the right to marry. This has put the American church in a unique situation. How should the church respond? Should we make signs that read along the lines of “Pray Away the Gay” or “God Created Adam and Eve, not Steve” and protest outside the White House and Capitol Building? Should we obey the call for tolerance from this culture and just let them be “happy?” Should our pulpits be silent on the issue? Should they only preach God’s love for homosexuals? God forbid. In all four possibilities, Christ would not be glorified and the church would not be preparing the world for His soon-coming return. So, what do we do?

                First, we must speak out in defense of the Bible’s position on homosexuality. To summarize our “Response to Homosexuality and Gay Adoption,” the Bible is clear that homosexuality is a sin. It does this by directly addressing it in 1 Corinthians 6 and Romans 1. It also does this by showing God’s plan for the family before sin entered into the world. In Genesis, God created man and woman to work the garden and multiply to fill the earth. There is no doubt about the clarity of Scripture regarding homosexual sin. We, the bride of Christ, must defend the truth He has revealed to us in Scripture. We must be willing to step into academia and defend the logic of God. Silence can no longer be our response.

                Second, we must reach out to homosexuals with the Gospel of Christ. We have the life-changing news that Jesus has come to this world to redeem us from our sin! We cannot afford to be labeled as homophobic when we are called to be salt and light. Christ has called us to be friends to homosexuals. We cannot condone their sin, but we must show them the love of Christ. Do not be quick to forget about our state before Christ changed us. We were enemies of the cross who were slaves to sin. We were hopeless. The same Jesus that died for us, died for them as well. Let us reach out to the homosexual community like never before in the history of the church!

                Third, we must honor and respect President Obama. Although, as the church, we should not agree with his position, we cannot think of him in hate or wish terrible things upon him. Romans 13:1 reads, “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.” Scripture makes it clear that God has placed President Obama in authority. Romans 13 continues to say that whoever rebels against authorities rebels against what God has instituted and is bringing judgment on himself. We respond to the President the same way we do homosexuals- with love. We are called to obey the government as long as it is not forcing us to do something that is against God’s commands. Can we show our disapproval of the President’s decision? Of course we can and should, but our response must be seasoned with the love of Christ.

               President Obama clearly does not hold the conservative views of an orthodox Christian, and he has done many things that hinder the church. Why is this? I believe Romans 13:3-4 holds that answer. “For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer.” As a nation, we have clearly done wrong in the eyes of God. We watch millions of lives be murdered year after year in the horrid act of abortion. We watch doctors end the lives of our elderly and helpless with an injection. We silently watch men take advantage of women in ways unthinkable through sex trade. We buy luxurious items just to play with while millions of people die of starvation and unclean drinking water around the world. Need I go any further? President Obama is being sovereignly used by God to give us as a people what we deserve. He is clearly one of God’s avengers who carry out His wrath.

              The American church must lead our nation to fall to her knees in desperate repentance to the holy God if we want this judgment to end. We must have a voice and it must be loud. We must have hands that serve the oppressed and helpless. We must have feet that run to the lost with the Gospel. We must teach children to seek God instead of the American dream. We must lead in the repentance of our dear country. President Obama is leading our country farther away from biblical principles, and it might just be our fault.

                Although our situation might seem hopeless, we know God hears our prayers. Our hope must be in Christ and Christ alone. He can heal our nation. As we speak up about the Bible’s stance on homosexuality, share the Gospel with homosexuals, respect our President, and repent of our sin, God will be faithful to us. He will not forsake His church in America. We must draw near unto God, and He will draw near unto us. Church, let us make a difference. Church, let us respond powerfully in love! Praise be to God for preserving this nation thus far, and may He continue to do so with His providential power.

WKU Condoms on Crosses

Posted by GCA student "C.W."

On April 24, 2012, the foundations of Western Kentucky University were shaken regarding the freedom of speech and expression. Elaina Smith, WKU art student, was seen placing condoms on some of the crosses that were set up in WKU’s old football stadium. These crosses were set in place by Hilltoppers for Life for the purpose of showing how many abortions occur in a day. This event stirred the Pro-Life and Christian community. The purpose of this response is to affectively show where one receives his rights and how the act offended Christians.
            Throughout this event, Elaina Smith and others adhere to the idea that this event was orchestrated out of a freedom of expression. The WKU students argue that it was just a part of the freedom of speech. Yet, according to the U.S. courts, the distribution of obscene materials is not a part of this freedom. Condoms are considered an obscene material because it is abhorrent to morality or values. If this was an act of freedom of expression and was highly legal, then shouldn’t we allow others to experience this freedom? Shouldn’t we allow serial killers, pedophiles, sociopaths, and others to express how they feel? Yet, anyone in their right mind would not allow that.  If everyone was allowed a freedom of creativity, then extremists would be allowed to put their plans into action, and who knows where the human race would be today.
            This event is also seen as just a class project in which learning and debating is free to flow from. Yet, was this, as art professor, Kristina Arnold, says, just a lesson in debating? This act, as seen by myself and many others, was not a form of debating, it was more of a form of vandalism. This is where we see how it was offending to Christians. To a Christian, the cross is a symbol of Jesus Christ’s saving power and love, but when a condom or any other object is added, it will cause an upset. For example, if beef were placed on a Hindu symbol, it would cause the same effect. President Gary Ransdell said, “No member of our University family should impede another member of our family’s freedom of speech or creative effort, especially when it comes to exercising religious freedoms. The offending student has apologized. This matter has been dealt with properly, decisively, and brought to a conclusion.” Mr. Ransdell seems to have ended this conflict very well, but in all reality it has not ended. Elaina Smith has yet to issue and apology, and doesn’t seem willing to in the future. Hilltoppers for Life request that she does not get credit for this project, and is right in wishing so. This was not an act of art, but of vandalism and was thus offensive.

Sources:

Article: Art Professor of Student, Accused Of Desecrating Pro-Life Cross Display For Project, Speaks Up by Elsa Bolt